Steering the Course: A Conversation on Impactful Investment and Divestment Strategies

Corporate divestment can be a powerful tool for promoting social, environmental, and economic change. But how does it work, and what does successful divestment look like? These were the key issues discussed in a recent meeting involving investment experts, activists, and concerned individuals. The conversation covered a range of topics, from the impact of divestment on a company’s bottom line to the hurdles faced by those advocating for change.

The Complexities of Divestment

Investment firms often resist divestment for various reasons. As one participant noted, \”Most investment firms are not interested.\” However, the impact of persistent advocacy should not be underestimated. The more companies hear about the need for change, the more likely they are to take notice. As one participant said, \”It’s a process that will start to snowball.\”

\”We pressure from inside the boardroom\” – work with civil society groups – that can be effective

Abdur-Rauf then asked about the impact of divestment, prompting Sonia to explain that divestment doesn’t necessarily impact a company’s bottom line. Instead, it serves as a signaling mechanism, causing reputational damage that can drive change. Sonia cited the successful divestment campaigns of the ’80s against apartheid South Africa and the Divest-Invest campaign around fossil fuels as examples.

The Role of Shareholder Advocacy

Sonia also highlighted the vital role of shareholder advocacy, referencing the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR). The ICCR works with groups to file shareholder proposals, creating another avenue for change.

\”Shareholder advocacy… it’s a form of pressure that can be incredibly effective.\”

However, Khanh raised an important point: how can individuals without investments fight for change? How about launching new vehicles or lobbying to change existing organizations? He asked about the flow of money and the key players in this space.

Creating New Systems

In response to these questions, Sonia pointed to organizations like ShareAction and Weapon Free Funds as resources for individuals looking to make a difference. She also addressed Salman’s question about targeting the defense industry specifically, mentioning the ‘don’t bank on the bomb’ campaign against nuclear weapons investment.

Naheed, a semi-retired investment manager, stressed the need for new systems, instruments, and investment pools. Sonia agreed, arguing that investment managers often resist change and make excuses. She asserted that investment pools can easily be started, and that resistance to change often comes from a lack of motivation, not feasibility.

\”Investment managers just don’t want to change – they are not motivated to.\”

The conclusion was clear: individuals, corporations, and investment managers all have a role to play in promoting socially and environmentally responsible investments. The path may be challenging, but the potential impact is enormous.

“,
“summary”: “A recent meeting discussed the complexities of corporate divestment and investment as tools for social, environmental, and economic change. The conversation revealed that while investment firms often resist divestment, persistent advocacy can lead to change. The meeting also highlighted the importance of shareholder advocacy and the possibility of creating new systems and investment pools.”,
“resources”: ”

Resources & Links

<a href=’ShareAction”>https://www.shareaction.org’>ShareAction | Harness the power of investment
<a href=’Weapon”>https://weaponfreefunds.org’>Weapon Free Funds | Weapon Free Funds
<a href=’Don’t”>https://www.dontbankonthebomb.com’>Don’t Bank on the Bomb – Who profits from producing nuclear weapons?
<a href=’ICCR”>https://www.iccr.org’>ICCR – Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

”
}

Freedom Advocacy Network

recent posts

about